In collaboration Iranian Medicinal Plants Society

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D. Department of Soil Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of plant production, university of Torbat Heydarieh

3 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Torbat Heydarieh, Torbat Heydarieh, Iran

4 Ph.D. Student of Agronomy, Saffron Institute researcher, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran.

5 -Assistant Professor, Department of water science engineering. University of hormozgan, Minab higher ducation center, Minab, Iran.

Abstract

Cow manure is one of the most commonly used fertilizers in saffron cultivation, but its main problem is the slow process of decomposition and the slow release of nutrients in the short term; leading to over use of chemical fertilizers by farmers. It is expected that with the introduction of nanotechnology in the field of agriculture, a suitable solution will be found to improve the absorption time of organic fertilizers. Cattle manure nanoparticles can reduce the decomposition time of cattle manure with higher specific surface area. Therefore, a split-plot design was carried out using two conventional methods of mulching and mixing with soil on the performance of saffron and soil characteristics to compare the performance of conventional chemical fertilizers and cow manure with nano cow manure.The main factor in seven levels (including nano cow manure in two amounts of five and 20 tons per hectare and in two forms of application of mulch and mixed with soil, normal cow manure in the amount of 20 tons per hectare and in two forms of mulch and mixed with soil and no use cow manure) and the sub-factor included NPK chemical fertilizer (at two levels of use and non-use). The results showed that by making cattle manure nanosized, its half-life in the soil decreased from about 36 weeks to 11 weeks. Nano cow manure treatment of 20 tons per hectare mixed with soil showed an increase in dry stigma yield by 43.7, 46 and 57%, respectively, compared to conventional cow manure treatments, chemical fertilizer treatments, and controls. The nano application of cow manure resulted in maintaining more moisture, less mechanical resistance in the soil, and more percentage of nutrients in the plant. In the comparison of the two methods of mulching and mixing, it was observed that in the mulching method, the amount of moisture is higher and the surface mechanical resistance is lower in the soil, and in the mixing method, the amount of nutrients in the leaves is higher. The results showed that in treatments with nano cow manure, the mixed method is preferable to mulch. By making cattle manure nano, using the mixed method instead of mulch and applying higher levels of cattle manure, was reduced the synergistic effect of chemical fertilizers in increasing yield. As in nano cow manure treatment (20 tons per hectare mixed with soil) was not observed significant yield increase due to the addition of chemical fertilizer. Also, nano cow manuew five ton per hectare treatments (mulch and mixture) showed a 22% yield increase compared to conventional cow manure treatments. It is possible to increase the yield by 22% by making cow manure nanosized, along with reducing the consumption of cow manure by 75% in the second year of saffron cultivation.

Keywords

Main Subjects

Atarodi, B., Zabihi, H.R., and Zangiabadi, M. 2022. Evaluation of Nutrition status of saffron (Crocus sativus L.) in South Khorasan province by “Deviation from optimum percentage” (DOP) method. Saffron Agronomy and Technology 10 (2): 117-127. (In Persian whit English Summary). https://doi.org/10.22048/jsat.2022.315828.1443.
Bremner, J.M., and Mulvaney, C.S. 1982. Nitrogen-Total. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties, Page, A.L., Miller, R.H., and Keeney, D.R. Eds., American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin, 595-624.
Chen, J.H. 2008. The combined use of chemical and organic fertilizers and/or bio-fertilizer for crop growth and soil fertility. International workshop on sustained management of the soil-rhizosphere system for efficient crop production and fertilizer use. National Chung Hsing University, Taiwan, 16 – 20 October 2006, p. 1-11.
Chen, J.H., Wang, Y.J., Zhou, D.M., Cui, Y.X., Wang, S.Q., and Chen, Y.C. 2010. Adsorption and desorption of Cu(II), Zn(II), Pb(II), and Cd(II) on the soils amended with Nanoscale hydroxyapatite. Environmental Progress and Sustainable Energy 29 (2): 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.10371.
Collection of Nanotechnology Industrial Reports. 2015. Nanotechnology and its development in agriculture. First edition. Report No. 45. Available at Web site http://indnano.ir/wp-content/uploads/45-Ariculture.pdf. (In Persian).
Collection of Nanotechnology Industrial Reports. 2015. Increasing the production and quality of agricultural products using biological Nano fertilizers. First edition. Report No. 23. Available at Web site http://indnano.ir/wp-content/uploads/23-NanoFertilizer.pdf (In Persian).
Dastranj, M., and Sepaskhah, A.L. 2019. Saffron response to irrigation regime, salinity and planting method. Scientia Horticulture 251: 215-224. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.scienta.2019. 03.027.
Gee, G.W., and Bauder, J.W. 1982. Hydrometer method. In: A. Klute (eds). Methods of Soil Analysis: Physical Properties. Part 1, 2nd., ed., Monogr. No.9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI. p. 383-411.
Gehan, G., Mostafa, A., and Abo-Baker, A.A. 2010. Effect of bio- and chemical fertilization on growth of sunflower at south valley area. Asian Crop Science 2: 137-146. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajcs.2010.137.146.
Gliessman, R.S. 2006. Agroecology: The Ecology of Sustainable Food Systems. 2en ed.  CRC Press. Boca Raton, FL. The USA.
Ghazanshahi, J. 2006. Plant and Soil Analysis. Aiizh Publications. Tehran. Iran. (In Persian).
Ghosh, P.K., Ramesh, P., Bandyopadhay, K.K., Tripathi, A.K., Hati, K.M., and Misra, A.K. 2004. Comparative effectiveness of cattle manure, poultry manure, phosphocompost, and fertilizer-NPK on three cropping system in vertisols of semi-arid tropics. II. Dry matter yield, nodulation, chlorophyll content, and enzyme activity. Bioresource Technology 95: 85-93.
Handley-Sidhu, S., Renshaw, J.C., Moriyama, S., Stolpe, B., Mennan, C., Bagheriasl, S., Yong, P., Stamboulis, A., Paterson-Beedle, M., Sasaki, K., Pattrick, R.A.D., Lead, J.R., and Macaskie, L.E. 2012. Uptake of Sr2+ and Co2+ into biogenic hydroxyapatite: Implications for biomineral ion exchange synthesis. Environmental Science and Technology 45 (16): 6985–6990. https://doi.org/10.1021/es2015132.
Kalbasi, M. 1996. The status of organic matter in Iranian soils and the role of compost. The 5th Congress of Soil Sciences of Iran. Karaj. Iran. p. 7-11. (In Persian).
Karimzadeh, F., Ghasemzadeh, A., and Salemizadeh, S. 2005. Nanomaterials: Properties, Synthesis, Application. Jahad Esfahan University of Technology. Esfahan. Iran. (In Persian).
Knudsen, D., Peterson, G.A., and Pratt, P.F. 1982. Lithium, sodium and potassium. Methods of soil analysis: chemical and microbiological properties. Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monoger. No.9. In: A. L. Page (eds.), ASA and SSSA, Madison. WI. P. 225-246
Koocheki, A., Jamshid Eyni, M., and Seyyedi, S. 2015. The effects of mother corm size, manure and chemical fertilizers on replacement corm criteria and yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.), Journal of Saffron Research 2 (1): 34-46. (In Persian whit English Summary).
https://doi.org/10.22077/jsr.2015.328.
Lean, E.O. 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. Methods of soil analysis: Chemical and microbiological properties. Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monoger. No.9. In: A. L. Page (eds.), ASA and SSSA, Madison. p. 199-224.
Liu, R., and Lal, R. 2014. Synthetic apatite nanoparticles as a phosphorus fertilizer for soybean (Glycine max). Scientific Reports (4): 5685–5691. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05686.
Magdoff, F., and Weil, R.R. 2004. Soil Organic Matter in Sustainable Agriculture. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780203496374.
Malakouti, M.J., and Homaee, M. 2003. Soil Fertility of Arid and Semi-arid Regions Difficulties and Solutions. Publication of Tarbiat Modarres University. Tehran. Iran. (In Persian).
Montalvo, D., McLaughlin, M.J., and Degryse, F. 2015. Efficacy of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles as phosphorus fertilizer in Andisols and Oxisols. Soil Science Society of America Journal 79 (2): 551–558. http://dx.doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2014.09.0373.
Movahedi Naeini, A., and Rezei, M. 1999. Soil physics (basics and application). Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources. Goletan. Iran. (In Persian).
Naghavi Maremati, A., Bahmanyar, M.A., Pirdashti, H., and Salak Gilani, S. 2007. Effect of different rates and types of organic and chemical fertilizers on yield and yield components of different rice cultivars. 10th Iranian Conference of Soil Science, Tehran, p. 766-767. (In Persian). https://issc.areeo.ac.ir/article_29398.pdf.
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Frank, S., and Dean, L.A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. Washington DC: United States Department of Agriculture.
Rezaei, H. 2013. A review of research on the use of cow manure in agricultural lands of Iran. Journal of Land Management 1 (1): 55-68. (In Persian). https://doi.org/10.22092/lmj.2013.100076.
Rezvani Moghaddam, P., Khorramdel, S., and Mollafilabi, A. 2015. Evaluation of soil physical and chemical characteristics impacts on morphological criteria and yield of saffron (Crocus sativus L.). Journal of Saffron Research 3 (2): 188-203. (In Persian whit English Summary).
https://doi.org/10.22077/JSR.2015.294.
Richards, L.A. 1969. Diagnosis and improvement of saline and alkali soils. Agriculture Handbook No:60. US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC. The USA.
Rhoades, J.D. 1982. Soluble salts. Methods of soil analysis: Chemical and microbiological properties. Part 2, 2nd ed. Agron. Monoger. No.9. In: A. L. Page (eds.), ASA and SSSA, Madison. WI. p. 167-179
Roco, M.C., and Bainbridge, W.S. 2013. The new world of discovery, invention, and innovation: Convergence of knowledge, technology, and society. Journal of Nanoparticle Research 15 (9): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-013-1946-1.
Shirani, H., Hajabasi, M.A., Afyuni, M., and Hemmat, A. 2002. Effect of farmyard manure and tillage system on soil physical properties and corn yield in central Iran. Soil and Tillage Research. 68 (2): 101-108. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-1987(02)00110-1.
Walkley, A., and Black, I.A. 1934. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Science 37: 29-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003.
Wang, D., Jin, Y., and Jaisi, D.P. 2015. Cotransport of hydroxyapatite nanoparticles and hematite colloids in saturated porous media: Mechanistic insights from mathematical modeling and phosphate oxygen isotope fractionation. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 182: 194–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconhyd.2015.09.004.
Yarami, N., and Sepaskhah, A.R. 2015. Saffron response to irrigation water salinity, cow manure and planting method. Agricultural Water Management 150 (2015): 57–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2014.12.004.
Zabihi, H. 2017. Management of nutrition in saffron plant. Technical publication 555. Publications of Soil and Water Research Institute. Available at Web site: https://agrilib.areeo.ac.ir/book_6151.pdf (In Persian).
Zhang, Z., Li, M., Chen, W., Zhu, S., Liu, N., and Zhu, L. 2010. Immobilization of lead and cadmium from aqueous solution and contaminated sediment using nano-hydroxyapatite. Environmental Pollution 158 (2): 514–519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2009.08.024.